At 09:29 AM 5/18/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>On Fri, 18 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> >At 09:19 AM 5/18/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >
> >>And then I find the magical 'if(!issock) {' line.. :)
> >>But still I'd rather nuke mmap..HOW fast is it anyway
> >>compared to reading/writing in chunks?
> >
> >I think it probably isn't really faster (at least not noticeably) because
> >we are anyway writing to network which I think is our bottleneck. Also it
> >is not necessarily faster on all systems (it is system independent).
> >I agree with you and think we should just nuke it from there. There is no
> >good reason I can think of which justifies it in that code.
>
>Agreed. Rather have a new function that uses mmap() ie. mmap_readfile()
>or whatever the name would be for it.
There is no need for a new function IMO.
>I'd like to hear Sascha's reasoning for adding mmap() in the first place.
>Maybe he had something special in his mind?
>
>"date: 1999/09/11 18:15:39; author: sas; state: Exp; lines: +57 -19
>optimize fpassthru/readfile to use mmap instead of fread
>which especially increases speed on large files."
OK but I really don't think it's such a big deal. Especially with the
slower network pipe it is hard for me to believe that it really makes a
performance difference on most systems.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
