There is no problem in getting it to work but the question is if we can do it in a nice way. How would eval() know if it's evaling something which should start in a PHP or HTML context? You'd have to send it another argument. This would start being a bit ugly. Is it such a big deal? Andi
At 05:15 PM 10/1/2001 -0600, Chris Newbill wrote: >Not sure what discussion has been done on this subject before, but here it >goes. > >I wan't to be able to use a function that does the same thing as include, >except instead of passing a file name I pass the actual string to be >processed. This differs from eval() because the string may be all HTML. > >I've seen numerous hacks on how to get this functionality out of eval() such >as prepending ?> and appending <? to your string, and creating temp files to >include, etc. But this is somewhat ugly. > >I'm certain this function could be made easily, and if no one wants to do it >simply point me in the direction where to find the code for >include()/include_once() and I'm sure I can make something work. > >-Chris > > >-- >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
