If it is called HTML mode then yes, but if there happened to be PHP in the string it would be processed as PHP code. I'll assume that is what HTML mode does???
-Chris -----Original Message----- From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:37 AM To: Chris Newbill; PHP DEV Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] include() like functionality for strings I must have misunderstood you. Weren't you asking for an eval() which starts PHP in HTML mode instead of PHP code mode? Andi At 06:06 PM 10/1/2001 -0600, Chris Newbill wrote: >Why would we have to pass it another argument? We don't pass an argument to >include() to tell it whether or not it is HTML. > >There has to be somesort of mechanism that include is using to parse the >file/execute any PHP inside it. So basically all we would be doing is >elimanting the file I/O part of include and going straight to the >parsing/executing of the string we pass. > >This would probably be best as a new function. I'm not sure how it would >affect BC if eval was modified to handle this. > >-Chris > >-----Original Message----- >From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:55 PM >To: Chris Newbill; PHP DEV >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] include() like functionality for strings > > >There is no problem in getting it to work but the question is if we can do >it in a nice way. >How would eval() know if it's evaling something which should start in a PHP >or HTML context? You'd have to send it another argument. This would start >being a bit ugly. >Is it such a big deal? >Andi > >At 05:15 PM 10/1/2001 -0600, Chris Newbill wrote: > >Not sure what discussion has been done on this subject before, but here it > >goes. > > > >I wan't to be able to use a function that does the same thing as include, > >except instead of passing a file name I pass the actual string to be > >processed. This differs from eval() because the string may be all HTML. > > > >I've seen numerous hacks on how to get this functionality out of eval() >such > >as prepending ?> and appending <? to your string, and creating temp files >to > >include, etc. But this is somewhat ugly. > > > >I'm certain this function could be made easily, and if no one wants to do >it > >simply point me in the direction where to find the code for > >include()/include_once() and I'm sure I can make something work. > > > >-Chris > > > > > >-- > >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
