Rasmus - whatever that issue is, it has not been fixed in HEAD. Zeev
At 17:43 10/11/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >I think the assumption that the PHP_4_0_7 branch is "pretty stable" and >"pretty much ready to go" is the key here. How do you know? I think it >is up to the QA team to tell us if this is the case. From what I can see, >I don't think this is so. > >Jani, did you ever resolve that issue you posted about on Oct.24 related >to bug #13806? You said it was only reproducable in the branch but fine >in HEAD at the time. > >-Rasmus > >On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > We have a bit of a dilemma here. As you all know, the 4.0.7 branch, on > > which 4.1.0 is currently scheduled to be based on, has branched away a few > > months ago. Some people have expressed concern that releasing 4.1.0 based > > on that branch is not a good idea, because there have been so many changes > > in the HEAD branch, and synchronizing fixes and so on is going to be a > > headache. > > > > There are basically two options: > > (a) Go with 4.1.0 based on 4.0.7 the way we originally > > intended. Pros: It's pretty stable, tested, and pretty much ready to go > > out the door with minimum extra work. Cons: We get a release out there > > that is based on code from several months ago, which doesn't contain some > > bug fixes and changes. > > (b) Drop the current release branch. Rebranch from HEAD, and release > 4.1.0 > > based on the current CVS. Pros: All of the bug fixes/features go into > > 4.1.0, we don't release a version based on old code. Cons: Requires a > > complete new cycle of QA, as lots of key issues changed since we > > branched. Two major examples that come to mind are the sessions code > > (trans_sid) and file uploads, which were very significantly changed. > > > > My personal opinion is that we should go on with (a), and start the > release > > process for 4.2.0, based on the latest CVS, immediately afterwards. I > fear > > instability in the new sessions/file upload code too much, and don't want > > to delay 4.1.0 for much longer. > > > > Thies, on the other hand, supports option (b), because he's afraid of > > having a new release based on several months old CVS is going to be a > headache. > > > > Your comments are quite welcome, let's try to reach consensus as soon > as we > > can (wishful thinking? :) > > > > Zeev > > > > > > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
