I agree that it should be kept on php-dev. That's the most efficient way of reaching everyone that will be affected.
- Stig Andi Gutmans wrote: > > I suggest keeping it on php-dev. > All of the build stuff has been done by php-dev in the past as build/PECL > related discussions really are php-dev. > It also means that php-dev won't be allowed to cut themselves out of what's > happening with PECL and it won't lead to some php-dev ppl who don't > subscribe to PECL to be surprised in a few months time :) > > Andi > > At 02:16 PM 1/2/2002 -0500, Jon Parise wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:09:10PM +0100, Martin Jansen wrote: > > > > > >I suggest we move PECL either to its own mailing list or to php-dev. > > > > > > +1 for it's own mailing list. Additionally we could perhaps set up > > > an own CVS module for PECL. (Currently it resides in /pear/PECL.) > > > Guys? > > > >I think I agree on both points ([EMAIL PROTECTED] and > >/PECL). > > > >-- > >Jon Parise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . Information Technology (2001) > >http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
