On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Marc Boeren wrote: > > > make much sense to me. The current way suits fine, but maybe > > this should be allowed too (as Hartmut wrote): function (foo,,bar); > > Please don't! > I cannot read code that looks like fn(,,,,foo,,,,bar);, that is just a > parameter-guessing-game!
Of course, that looks likes crap, but one parameter not specified is not a problem IMO. > Then again, that probably means that fn() is badly designed... Indeed, there are a few functions (you can count them on two hands) will need this at all. Derick -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
