> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This sort of bothers me. Who is this "our" you talk about? As
>> contributor  of the msession extension, am I not also part of "our"
>> and don't I get a  say on the priorities of msession?
> 
> not if these priorities are in contradiction to the overall goals, and
> as such BC is not *that* important on a developement branch

Perhaps, but it is not "contrary" either.

> 
>> I can understand your position, but the msession extension not a
>> difficult  peice of code. I have updated the proto comments so they
>> correctly state  what the functions do. Just tell me what else you
>> want for comments.
> 
> the #ifdef OLD_ZEND_PARAM stuff obfuscates it without need,
> especially in the additional places where you use it like this
> 
>    #ifdef OLD_ZEND_PARAM
>       php_log_err("Call to connect with non-null s_conn");
>    #else
>       php_log_err("Call to connect with non-null s_conn" TSRMLS_CC);
>    #endif
> 
> the behaviour you test for is not at all related to the parameter
> parsing functions, its just by coincidence that both are related
> to the same api version number switch

What's a better test?





-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to