August wrote: > Sebastian wrote: > >>I don't know if httpd-2.0 still supports statically compiled modules or >> > >>if PHP's --with-apache option needs tweaking. Why don't you use DSO >>anyhow? It's the preferred method. >> > > Why in the world is DSO the preferred method? Is this documented > somewhere?
In apache document. > > I find DSO useful for testing and development, but for deployment it > makes little sense to be using DSO, the cost of 60 seconds of compile is > negligible when looking at something that will be installed for > timeframes exceeding a day or two, especially for larger server farms. The benefit of DSO is loading modules without compile whole apache. For instance, I would like to use info or status module when I have problem with my web servers, but I don't want to enable them all the time. -- Yasuo Ohgaki -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
