On 5 May 2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 13:25, Christian Stocker wrote: > > > > if noone else really would like to do it, i can take over this part. I > > don't think, there's much new stuff in domxml since 4.2 (yes, there is > > some, but nothing really critical), but testing all this would be a good > > idea, maybe adding missing functions from the DOM-Specs as well (but this > > depends until when we want tp release php4.3). I'm already using domxml from > > 4.3 on my testing machine and didn't realize any problems with it till > > now. > > Ok, sounds like this one won't be a "major change" either then. You're > off the hook ;-)
I still think DomXML underwent a lot of changes so that it should be classified as 'major change'. It should no wbe conformant to the w3c specs, and a little bit testin if that's really the case can do no harm. Derick --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did I help you? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/registry/SLCB276UZU8B Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
