At 17:43 12/05/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote: > I've just noticed that you have kicked out the premier > implementation of the same functionality in favor of the dog > slow old one.
I almost missed those idyllic descriptions :) > Note that relying on output buffering alone is inferior, > because (a) it is not always enabled It can be enabled for this purpose alone, if you think it's that much of an issue (I don't, but I don't mind doing that either). > and (b) it does not > address the inherent flaws in the zend implementation. What inherent flaws? So far, the only difference between them that I could spot was that php_html_puts() was buggy, and did not convert series of spaces into 's. Otherwise, the only difference was the use of buffering. I may have missed something, though. > I suggest reverting that commit and doing whatever is > necessary to improve the zend implementation. > > This could be achieved by defining a function pointer > zend_html_puts with the same parameters as php_html_puts and > let applications set that function pointer. The default > could continue to point to the current zend_html_puts code. I don't see why it's necessary. If you think buffering phpinfo() is really necessary, then we can enable buffering for it. Zeev -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
