Ok, But take ext/domxml it requires a newerversion of libxml2. I didn't have it installed on my machine when i installed php. If we bundle say a specfic version of libxml2 that domxml depends on, then it won't matter how fast pased the development is, ext/domxml won't use it. We can obvisouly peridocially upgrade the version that is bundled and you can have an override if you want to use a different version that is installed on a system. As xml gets more and more popular i feel that domxml will be more and more popular.
"Build outta the box" - Brad --- Christian Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > It was mentioned before about bundling libxml2 with php with expat or > instead > > of expat. Where do we stand with this? I emailed the developer asking > > permission to bundle it if we choose to do it (no response yet). > > öhm, libxml2 is a relatively huge project with a fast developement cycle.. > I don't see the point in bundling that with php. It's actively maintained > (not as for example gd), we don't need any patches to get it running and > it comes with most (all?) distros (not installed by default everywhere, > but it's available). And installation from source is also no pain at > all... > > chregu > > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
