At 19:29 30.05.2002, brad lafountain wrote: >--- "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 18:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote: > > > > > > > The 2M size has alot of stuff that we wouldn't need. Im sure we > can get > > it > > > > down to under 500K. > > > > > > I still think 500kb is too much for something the most ppl already have > > > installed. > > > > Having a too old version installed doesn't help much in this case. :-) > > > > If Brad is able to trim down libxml2 to a reasonable size, I'm +1 > > Got it a little under 800k....
I would very much appreciate that and 800k is o.k. because the xml part will become a key technology very soon, meaning without xml, soap and such running out-a-box php will get lost. so for me +++1 > Just the c source alone was 500k. There are a few source files with > 10000 >lines. > > > I still would like to see it bundled. I do understand that libxml2 is being >developed regulary but since domxml does require a semi-new version of libxml2 >that most people don't have. I don't know when 2.4.14 was released but the >date >on the file server is 2/8/2002. Thats pretty recent. I don't/didn't have that >version installed on my system. Pretty much every project that i work on uses >some kinda xml processing I don't know if thats true for a majority of people >or not but I definlty rely on it alot. If we bundle 2.4.14 we can change >domxml's config script to detect the version on the system if its greater than >2.4.14 then it can link against that version if it isn't then it will use the >bundled version. As far as upgrading the version that is bundled. How often or >if ever do we need to. If changes in domxml require a newer version of libxml2 >then thats when we can upgrade the bundled lib otherwise we wouldn't need to. > >From my understanding libxml2 is faster than expat? and all the things like >ext/xml and ext/xmlrpc can be converted to libxml2? Since we do bundle expat i >don't see the big problem with bundling libxml2. > >So the only down side I see is the filesize of php? I don't see that as too >much of a problem but thats just my opnion too. > >I personally will take responsiblity for bundling and upgrading it. > > - Brad > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > >-- >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
