True, I hear it is even possible to reuse code in COBOL : ) I believe that the ease of maintenance depends purely on the language. i.e. using a strictly procedural language for a large framework can be quite messy. Have you ever seen large libraries written in perl that consistently call "require" on a million files.
PEAR is a good example of a framework that ran into a lot of limitations of the language, which ZE2 will provide a great deal of help in. -Jason On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 09:36, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Code reusability is a psychological issue. You can reuse code in PHP 4, > and it'll be even better in 5 - PEAR is a clear demonstration of > this. Whether people actually end up reusing code depends on the way they > code, very little does it depend on the language. > > Zeev > > At 05:27 PM 6/7/2002, Jason T. Greene wrote: > >IMO, one of the big reasons for having a powerful OO mode, and > >continually evolving php to have a bigger target than just "a web > >programming language", is code re-usability. You can design a nice > >consistent Framework, and easily rollout web, gui, and back end > >applications all using the same framework. > > > >-Jason > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
