That's whay I think too, but it would still take some time to do proper QA on it. Doing RC1 tomorrow would be no problem, but QA should still be coordinated, and as I'm away for three weeks annoying Jani in finland, I wonder who should do it then?
regards, Derick On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > +1, I don't think we need to do more than one RC for it.. > As only bug fixes have been merged to that branch anyway. > > --Jani > > > -- > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > >FWIW, I don't see why releasing it should take 5 weeks. I think releasing > >it can take pretty much as long as we decide it should take. I think we > >just got used to have slow-moving, lingering release processes. > > > >At 15:06 27/07/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>>I'm +1 for Stig's opinion. > >>>Declaring 4.2.3 a no-no was both Stig's and mine suggestion. > >> > >>Then no 4.2.3 and we will have 4.3.0 branch on Sunday. > >>(Bad news for some users, good news for us ;) > >> > >>-- > >>Yasuo Ohgaki > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did I help you? http://www.derickrethans.nl/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.derickrethans.nl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
