On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:50:04PM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 20:24 18/08/2002, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:19:52PM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >> I haven't, because of the two reasons I mentioned. There's nothing about
> >> the specifics of the patch that can make me change my personal mind about
> >> it...
> >> I understand you disagree with me about the momentum issue, so let's
> >agree
> >> to disagree.
> >
> > so you're saying we effectifly stop working on improvements
> > for ZE1?
>
> Yep.
so - cool, you (z&a) stopped working on it. does that mean
it's now written in stone and nobody is allowed to touch it?
i have asked very nicely if you could review a patch i've
written. i have cc'ed you and andi as you are the authors of
the engine. - no reply -
the reply i got after pinging again had _no_ technical
background whatsoever. i have asked on php-dev and not
php-tellmeyoufeelingsaboutthefuture.
this is more than a little frustrating for me and i'm sure
not too many ppls will be happy about your "desupport notice"
for ZE1.
>
> > not sure if too many ppls will be happy to hear that whitout
> > even having a clear roadmap for ZE2..
>
> We have a pretty clear roadmap for ZE2 AFAIK. We're currently lingering
> for no good reason.
apache 2.0 - does that ring a bell?
tc
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
