The last time we had this discussion a few People didn't
liked that kind of flex^H^H^H^Hcomplexity in the include
file.
Hell, you even could just use an PHP source-file for it ... :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:34:30PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just make
> it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it.
>
> if we want to make the ini file more powerful, there are *many* things that
> can be done... it just really depends how powerful it needs to be
> (especially since php works fine without an ini file at all)
>
> devon
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:29:00 +0200
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0700, David Viner wrote :
> > Hmm... in the apache world, the srm.conf and access.conf were deprecated,
> > but the Include directive in the configuration file is still maintained.
> > That is, by default, people use a single apache configuration file.
> > However, for specialized cases, like Brian's, people have the ability to
> use
> > multiple files if they want the extra work of multiple configuration
> files.
>
> Apache also has the <if> tags which makes things even more
> useful when it comes to including of optional features.
>
> --
> GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
> - It's not a fug, it's a beature. -
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
>
--
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
- It's not a fug, it's a beature. -
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
