-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 18 September 2002 09:49 pm, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Dan Hardiker wrote: > > Hi all [specifically those monitoring the patches thread], > > > > Ive noticed that alot of you seem to be asking questions which were > > actually answered in the original post of the thread. Can I request that > > anyone who has an opinion on this matter both read the thread, and (where > > possible) try out the patch for themselves to see what impact it really > > has. > > > > The underlying effect is minimal, no noticable change. The effect of > > having the option there is mind blowing for IRC based support staff who > > are dealing with (for want of a better word), idiots. > > > > For those of you who dont have time, or the capability to test it out for > > yourself, please take the following exampes: > > > > http://www.dapond.net/code/backtrace.php > > http://www.dapond.net/code/backtrace.phps > > http://www.dapond.net/code/backtrace.phps?HIGHLIGHT_FORMAT=default > > http://www.dapond.net/code/backtrace.phps?HIGHLIGHT_FORMAT=lineno > > Sorry guys. I still don't understand why we need to extend phps > capability ;) > > With script level, we can contol output/access as needed. > In addtion, it's much easier to maintain compare to phps once > you write appropriate script. Most importantly, it always works > at script level. I don't see what the problem is.....phps will still work as expected without the extra parameter. If you were on irc trying to help someone tell me how you'd explain to them that they need to change a line to something else without having line numbers. Furthermore, you'll have to tell them that they need to create another file just to view the source with line number when if we use the extra parameter we'd just tell them to copy the source to filename.phps. We're not just talking about supporting people that have some knowledge of php but also those that buy/download a module to add to their site(no knowledge or less.... :) ). > > Although I forgot details, I suppose we'll breake modulality > between Zend and PHP if we try to fix problem of phps. IMHO, > it does _not_ worth it. We shouldn't add new features that will > not working well. Therefore, phps should be left as it is now. > (If someone has feasible solution, I don't against that. of course) > > Why not just add new parameter to show_source/hilight_file? > We don't need to add new feature to phps, but should provide only > for functions. It should be good enough. They are getting a new parameter afaik! Why leave it at that?! I'm +1 on the changes.
- -- ~Paul Nicholson Design Specialist @ WebPower Design "The web....the way you want it!" [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It said uses Windows 98 or better, so I loaded Linux!" Registered Linux User #183202 using Register Linux System # 81891 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9iTIaDyXNIUN3+UQRAkoIAJ9P6ZqvHeq0OhZrLLBIfCY7IjSMEgCgmTAx d2qOoCUdyA0UdW663T96Asg= =24xg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
