At 17:40 23-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 14:29 23-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> >If people refuse to read documentatino for tool they don't deserve to
> >use it. Come'n.. if you are professional enough to even run a testsuite
> >then you're certainly professional enough to read a README.
>
> Unrelated to the ini issue, but could a:
> if(isset($ENV['DONT_ASK_QA'])) be implemented to facilitate automated
> builds/tests ?
Sure we can... but as I dont have any test can you come up with a patch
yourself (using getenv() instead of $_ENV)?
I disagree on the default, that's why I asked :)
Not a real issue for me though. Just don't know if it's a good idea to
put in interactivity in something that can become part of an interactive
application in the future - like PEAR.
So - for future compatibility I decided to go with NO_INTERACTION=1, which
should be wrapped around any (future) parts where user input is required.
However - this could apply to individual tests as well - for instance I can
imagine that readline tests, require user input.
If you agree, I can also make a patch to pass that on to the individual tests,
so SKIP implementations can work around that.
PS. Sorry for the override of your patch - I had already done the bit and the
docs.
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Webmaster IDG.nl
Melvyn Sopacua
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
