Jon Parise wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:38:09PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi Ilia and Jon,
Do you still think specifying ini used _for_ run-tests.php
is bad thing? I hope I've explained enough.
I think you don't care, do you?
I don't want to involve myself in some sort of religious argument that
I honestly know very little about. I do care about technical things,
however.
So, once again, all I really want to know is what is so special about
php.ini-dist? And what _specific_ settings do you (Yasuo) feel must
be applied to run-tests.php in order to run properly? And why can't
they just be specified via ini_set() calls.
In short, I just want to know why run-tests.php needs an external
dependency on php.ini-dist. I would much prefer run-tests.php to be
self-contained.
I really fail to see why we need to ask troubles for executing
run-tests.php. It's executed by various people and better to run
always with less problems when people typed "make test".
Anyway, main problem is Derick is changing the line w/o knowledge
of the consequence. He hasn't even fixed a issue I mentioned, yet
he reverted my patch twice. 1st time is ok, since he didn't
know, 2nd time is not ok since I let him know. He should fix the
problem I mentioned at the same time at least.
Don't think it's rude, Derick :)
Or is it too difficult for you to fix, even the problem I
explicitly mentioned?
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
