just making it in numbers: (users using short_tags) <> (users_using xml() function)
I suppose the first one wins. Now, wouldn't it be possible to find a work around this issue? This should be a question, IMHO. -- Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:14:21 +0900 Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're > > going to have a zillion hacks for other XML/SGML/foobar documents. > > I agree. > We are better to leave it as documentation issue, IMO. > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > > > > > Andi > > > > At 12:17 PM 10/16/2002 -0400, Ilia A. wrote: > > > >> Since the general consensus by the developers is not to remove the > >> short_tags > >> or even disable them. Perhaps we should consider alternate solutions > >> to this > >> problem. Given the buzzword popularity of XML and its slowly growing > >> popularity among website designers (XHTML) this issue is likely to > >> come up in > >> the future yet again. > >> The solution I would like to offer, is a patch that adds special > >> handling for > >> <?xml. Thus preventing the language parser from attempting to parse data > >> inside <?xml as PHP source. > >> > >> Ilia > > > > > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
