On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 11:57 25-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
[snip]
>
> >I do not see a real use to rename tests, but IMO this is the way to go
> >for newly written tests. Of course renaming tests is ok too if you like
> >to do that :)
>
> There's one drawback. Extensions with names after 'b' get evaluated after
> the bug tests.
> This is currently not a problem, but I've been playing with the thought to
> introduce 'skip_ext' to speed things up:
> --SKIP--
> <?php if(!extension_loaded('dba3')) { die("skip_ext this extension is not
> available"); } ?>
>
> But of course you can just tell me to stop playing with the tought :)
Hereby I tell you to stop playing with that thought :P No, serious... I
don't think we really need this, and is speed really that important?
(The whole suite runs in under a minute here with about 75% of the
extensions).
Derick
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
JDI Media Solutions
--------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
