> > > > I don't like us adding a new ini entry for this, I think we should try > > another option: > > > > 4) Make sure we can use fscanf on a dynamically sized buffer. This will > > definitely the hardest solution, but also the most beautiful one. > > I like this fourth option, because the internal scanf function will anyway > need reimplementation since it's not binary safe. > err. it didn't need a reimplementation, i fixed it, it works fine in cvs.
-Sterling > Moriyoshi > > > Derick > > > > -- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ > > PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -- > > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php