> > 
> > I don't like us adding a new ini entry for this, I think we should try 
> > another option:
> > 
> > 4) Make sure we can use fscanf on a dynamically sized buffer. This will 
> > definitely the hardest solution, but also the most beautiful one.
> 
> I like this fourth option, because the internal scanf function will anyway 
> need reimplementation since it's not binary safe.
>
err. it didn't need a reimplementation, i fixed it, it works fine in cvs.

-Sterling


> Moriyoshi
> 
> > Derick
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Derick Rethans                                 http://derickrethans.nl/ 
> >  PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals       http://php-mag.net/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to