Sterling Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > err. it didn't need a reimplementation, i fixed it, it works fine in cvs.
> > 
> > Then,
> > 
> > <?php
> >   $buf = "123 456 \0 567"
> >   sscanf($buf, "%d%d%s%d", $a, $b, $c, $d);
> >   var_dump($a, $b, $c, $d);
> > ?>
> > 
> > How about this?
> > 
> > The result was the same as for fscanf.
> >
> 
> Yes, but it didn't need a reimplementation as far as using arbitrary buffer 
> sizes.

Right, I just missed a big point about the scanf behaviour :)

Moriyoshi

> -Sterling


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to