On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:

> PHP shouldn't leak memory even if output/input from/to external program
> differs. It seems it's a PHP problem for this matter.

If you had read the thread you would have seen that the memory leak is 
only there in his patch.

Derick

> Ari Pollak wrote:
> > Unless you come up with a way to migrate 500+ virtualhosts to some other 
> > MTA, no, that is not feasible.
> > You can think of qmail like minix in both author and license, in that 
> > the author is really arrogant about changing the way his software 
> > behaves even though it's not standards-compliant, and you can't 
> > distribute modified binaries. And qmail has been on the same version for 
> > many years, so nobody is expecting him to actually put out a new version 
> > anytime soon.
> > In any case, I'm not expecting any qmail patch to actually go into PHP, 
> > but I'd really like to get this memory leak fixed for those who need 
> > this patch (me).
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:00:32AM -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> > 
> >>qmail devs == djb, right?
> >>
> >>If his support doesn't suffice (and you cant find it in the enormous 
> >>un-merged patch contributions that seem to litter the qmail community 
> >>websites), might I suggest a new MTA?  Exim works quite nicely.
> >>
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Derick Rethans                                 http://derickrethans.nl/ 
 PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals       http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to