Hm :( Ok, was a try ;)
Derick Rethans wrote:
Hey,
you're passing dangerous grounds with this email :), and most of these
points were brought up before.
Hehe how did I know that ;)
Then let's just stop this discussion now :(
Don't want to end in php 2003 summary as mail waster ;)
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Stephan Seidt wrote:
I've got some suggestions for zendengine2 (hopefully not too late).
What about an identificator for destrucotrs in a class like in c++?
I mean something like this :
<?php
class Foo
{
function Foo
{
// Constructor
}
function ~Foo
{
// Destructor
}
}
We decided to go with __construct and __destruct instead as those make
it much easier to rename classes for example.
And an idea about cloning of objects..
What about an operator for doing that ?
$cloned_object = %$object;
$clone = $object->__clone(); already works.
Last thing would be a possibility for overloading operators.
Not a chance :)
Where there already discussions about these things?
I think that would make the sourcecode shorter,
more understandable and also looking nicer ;)
Nicer is an objective statement, I would call it 'horrible' or
'perlish'. An archive can be found on news.php.net (php.dev) or
http://www.zend.com/lists/engine2/200301/maillist.html
regards,
Derick
--
IPv6 + TCPA + wrecked Palladium server = NO COFFE!
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
