Last ditch effort of "NotAPHPBug"? ;)

adamw

----- Original Message -----
From: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ilia A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf


> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Ilia A. wrote:
>
> > On January 15, 2003 10:14 am, Adam Wright wrote:
> > > Agreed in general. And whilst I'm here can I throw in my 2c about
"Bogus"?
> > > Although an accurate description, it's hardly likely to be perceived
as
> > > friendly. If you've taken the time to report a bug, even if you are in
> > > error, having it thrown back as "Bogus" seems pretty mean. How about a
less
> > > antagonistic wording? I'd put forward something like "NotaBug", which
gives
> > > the same information without putting people's backs up.
> >
> > "NotaBug" or similar may lead to confusion. Quite often the issue may
indeed
> > be a bug, however it is not a bug in PHP and is therefor bogus. By
marking
> > such a bug report "NotaBug" may lead to confusion.
> > IMO bogus is a fairly accurate representation of what the 'bogus' bug
reports
> > are, it is no more or less friendly then other bug status and is only a
> > problem (less 'friendly') if you choose to make it such.
>
> +1 on on that, but I do think that when a bug is set to bogus the reason
> why it is bogus should always be noted.
>
> Derick
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Derick Rethans                                 http://derickrethans.nl/
>  PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals       http://php-mag.net/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to