Adding a parameter to an existing function is the way to go I agree.
Timothy Hitchens (HiTCHO) Web Application Consulting e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 31 January 2003 8:00 AM > To: Jon Parise > Cc: Sara Golemon; PHP Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: str_ireplace vs. stri_replace > > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Jon Parise wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:44:27PM -0800, Sara Golemon wrote: > > > > > You're not the first to voice this opinion. *I* feel > str_ireplace > > > is better as it follows the naming convention of > > > <module>_<function>. Others feel stri_replace is better as that > > > follows eregi_replace's style. I have no trouble going with > > > whatever the majority feels is best. > > > > Get rid of stri_replace() and/or str_ireplace() and just > add a fourth > > optional parameter to str_replace() to control case-sensitivity. > > +1 on that. > > Derick > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > Derick Rethans > http://derickrethans.nl/ > PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for > Professionals http://php-mag.net/ > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
