Hey Phil,

On 1 July 2016 at 10:54, Phil Sturgeon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paddy:
>
> AFAIK, a few people - all active in this thread - reached out to Paul to
> discuss his behavior before this went to a vote. This two week discussion
> period is the time Paul has to answer peoples concerns. No pre-discussion
> period discussion period is known to exist.

I can appreciate that, but it's still unclear whether Paul was notified of
this vote/discussion prior to it being made public. It's clearly been
brewing for a while, but has no statement from Paul, or summary of dealings
with Paul, or...anything that could be construed as pre-existing attempts
at mediation with Paul.

If it's not documented, I can't assume it happened.

> When you say: "You cannot write an email without input from an accused
> member and maintain a neutral position.", if you are referring to the
> secretaries then I would disagree with you. The secretaries are passing on
> complaints from ~20 former and current members/contributors, not forming
> their own stance or opinions. Anyone with that many people complaining
> against them should be removed regardless.

The Secretaries, to put it lightly, should have side-stepped on this.

They are using their authority to achieve three goals:
1.    Summarising complaints against Paul.
2.    Calling a vote for removing Paul as a VM.
3.    Limiting the discussion period to the minimum.

Not one of these reflects an element of consideration for Paul's interests
from an impartial position. While I seriously DO NOT believe the
Secretaries intend to be biased, they have still given rise to the
appearance of it anyway.

That's down to a simple observation: voting members can call their own
votes. A voting member could have done everything the Secretaries did
(minus the multiple protestations of being impartial) and nobody would have
blinked.

The Secretaries made a choice to get involved and initiate this vote. They
didn't have to. If they are going to involve themselves in complaints, they
must figure out the best way of not appearing biased. They won't find that
in the bylaws because...er...I neglected to write them. My bad!

Paddy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CALwr1Gk%2Bmh_bjtCMT9Nz5CnoVKvgMrBdcsQDSBV8STSPyQaC2w%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to