On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 7:11:51 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > Paul, > > Per the precedent you set here : > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/php-fig/R5TQ_YD7unI/GBy-b8KIHa0J > during the Beau/Silex vote, it was argued and generally agreed upon that > the lead developer of a project has direct control over that project's > vote. Therefore, you, as the lead developer of Aura, would still have > control over a vote and wouldn't be impartial. >
I read through the thread a couple times, and the discussion and consensus seem to revolve around the idea of sub-projects acting as proxy votes for an umbrella project. Which parts of the thread were you referring to in particular? Thanks, Nate -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/9e32bc92-98ce-43dc-9ad8-c78208cbb685%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
