On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> It being under the FIG name in no way prevents or discourages anyone from > "trying it out" if they wish, and the Review period (current status) is > exactly for further "try it out". FIG 3's Review period includes an > explicit requirement for it. Larry, I think Paul is referring the fact that a PSR document is not (and cannot) be published on Packagist to get a feel for real-world usage without every project copy/pasting the interfaces in and potentially getting out of sync. I am in favor of PSRs being published on Packagist with 0.x versions before the PSR is ratified. We already see real benefits from this in http-interop. -- Woody Gilk http://about.me/shadowhand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAGOJM6JC5Bbt4zfqDB3ccssCR5iCrs_LtSd-7gDPObv6s-Bo3w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
