On 09/01/2016 02:34 PM, Woody Gilk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Larry Garfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It being under the FIG name in no way prevents or discourages
anyone from "trying it out" if they wish, and the Review period
(current status) is exactly for further "try it out". FIG 3's
Review period includes an explicit requirement for it.
Larry, I think Paul is referring the fact that a PSR document is not
(and cannot) be published on Packagist to get a feel for real-world
usage without every project copy/pasting the interfaces in and
potentially getting out of sync.
I am in favor of PSRs being published on Packagist with 0.x versions
before the PSR is ratified. We already see real benefits from this in
http-interop.
As you note, there's nothing about an independent interop group that's
necessary for pre-release packages on Packagist. PSR-13 already has
pre-release packages on Packagist:
https://packagist.org/packages/psr/link
https://packagist.org/packages/fig/link-util
We should be doing that more often, I agree. There's nothing at all
preventing FIG from doing so.
--Larry Garfield
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/62449748-94bb-1d0b-5aa5-d531540fe75b%40garfieldtech.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
