With due respect to your boss, PHP would make the site *more* compatible with
people's browsers, without having to worry about which version(s) of javascript
people have, or in fact if they even have it available. I'd pitch the
accessibility angle, in your shoes, if nothing else.
Good luck.
"Richard S. Crawford" wrote:
> The problem is that the main page doesn't use an include file of any sort;
> it's straight HTML which is frequently updated by hand. I agree that it
> would be nice if /index.htm had an include file that contained most of the
> content, and if I could convince my boss that it would be the best way to
> go, then I'd be set. :) Unfortunately, that's not the route that we've
> chosen to go (in fact, I'm still at the stage where I'm trying to convince
> people around here that PHP is a much better way to go than straight HTML
> for some of these documents). So, if I were using an include file to build
> /index.htm, then I would use it in microsite45/index.htm. But since I'm
> not, I can't. I've got permission to use document.write in /index.htm, so I
> was looking for a solution which would allow /index.htm to remain nothhing
> but static HTML (with the exception of some JavaScript).
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
