On Saturday 09 August 2003 01:46, Dan Phiffer wrote: > I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I > didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a different > purpose. I don't mind RTFM-style responses, but please at least read my > question more closely.
Sometimes I find it difficult to read minds -- especially on a Friday. bugs.php.net gives the definitive status of any known bugs so you can see what bugs are outstanding in any given version of php. Actually it'll give you everything you wanted to know about bugs in php but was afraid to ask. Whereas changelog, history, release notes will summarise what bugs were fixed between versions. None of these resources are called errata although some linux distros may present these as erratum (plural?). -- Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz Open Source Software Systems Integrators * Web Design & Hosting * Internet & Intranet Applications Development * ------------------------------------------ Search the list archives before you post http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general ------------------------------------------ /* When the revolution comes, count your change. */ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
