thanks, that pretty much cleared things up.. -> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- -> Van: Curt Zirzow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2003 6:30 -> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Onderwerp: Re: [PHP] ereg_replace vs. preg_replace [was: str_replace -> question] -> -> -> * Thus wrote Wouter van Vliet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): -> > -> > Btw, does anybody know why preg_replace is adviced over -> ereg_replace in the -> > manual? .. and if ereg_replace doesn't have any advantages over -> > preg_replace, couldn't this function get depricated? -> -> I've done some testing with ereg and preg functions and -> preg beats ereg by quite a bite (sorry don't have results) -> -> preg is much more advanced and can do a lot more things than ereg -> can. I think just by looking at the documentation (two separate -> pages, not related to the functions), you can see that it is rather -> thorough. -> -> The biggest disadvantage with preg is that since it is complex, -> mistakes can easily be overlooked. -> -> Only since 4.2.0 has preg_* functions been compiled by default so -> if a person wanted to write scripts that were portable across many -> different hosting sites they would use ereg_* functions. -> -> As for being deprecated, I doubt that will happen (as -> mentioned above) ereg_* has been around for many years, since early -> 3.x versions. Php developers may be familiar with the posix syntax -> so instead of learning the perl version they have the option to use -> the ereg_* functions. -> -> Although I haven't heard any (php) claims as such but some -> people may want -> to be 100% POSIX compatible :) -> -> -> Curt -> -- -> "I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure." -> -> -- -> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) -> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php ->
-- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
