> The internals developers probably didn't see a need to provide
> support for "return" in conditionals since it can't return a value
> to the conditional.
Ugh. This is the same misconception, again. Let's try some different code:
<?
function foo()
{
echo "foo\n";
}
function bar()
{
return true;
}
bar() or foo();
?>
The return of foo() does not matter. It is not evaluated. I do not understand
why this is still unclear. Consider this:
if (!bar())
{
foo();
}
Does it seem like foo() is involved in the conditional when expressed like
this? I hope not.
Chris
=====
My Blog
http://shiflett.org/
HTTP Developer's Handbook
http://httphandbook.org/
RAMP Training Courses
http://www.nyphp.org/ramp
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
