On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Jay Blanchard wrote: > > I would have to disagree. While it may be possible to implement good > > OOP in C++, it does not nearly implement OOP as well as many other > > languages. It also has many other design problems that hinder the > > learning of OOP. > > I respect your opinion and all, but how do you come to this conclusion? > Which of the "many other languages" implement OOP better?
Python, Ruby...? Of course, I've never done any OOP in C++. My guess is part of the reason he said this is because you've got to learn C++ before you're going to do much successful OOP with it. Not exactly a small learning curve. Other languages dispense with a lot of the formalities found in C++ (a good or bad thing, depending on your perspective). I found Python to be a great language to learn OOP, since it forces good habits on you. -- Kelly Hallman // Ultrafancy -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
