Sorry didn't mean to accuse you of attacking. Just had a more hectic
day than usual, and maybe lost it a bit.

Anyway, this is rapidly getting off topic, so......................


On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:52:25 +0100, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rory Browne wrote:
> > Jocham:
> > Uh???
> >
> > First of all, no that was not intended at you. Dhanasekar asked a
> > question, and I answered it. I don't think the rest of your
> > message/attack is particularly relevent, with the above taken into
> 
> no attack meant - please tell the russians its a false alarm :-)
> I wasn't sure who you were talking to I asked because you actually
> replied to my post not to the OP.
> 


> > account.
> >
> > I simply saw a question that I knew the answer to, and answered it as
> > best I could. It wasn't meant to talk down, or state obvious, but
> > rather to mention things, that people generally don't think of, or in
> > the case of the newbie guide/smart-question guide, just don't know.
> 
> which is actually quite difficult IMHO :-)
> 
> >
> > If you are going to judge my 'giving a little back' then try to get
> > your facts straight. I think my 'giving back' greatly outweighs my
> > 'taking' from this and any other tech forum that I've ever used. I'll
> > provide you with a sample if necessary.
> 
> wasn't judging, sorry if that caught you the wrong way - I thought that maybe
> the 'joke' about Richard winning the pissing content made that clear...
> nevermind, water under the bridge etc
> 
> lets hope Dhana comes back with something we can get our teeth into :-)
> 
>

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to