[snip] >Some people insist on making everything XHTML compliant just they assume >that otherwise it would not be "Web standards" compliant. That is a >silly claim that only leads to all sorts of problems. > > That assertion is 100% untrue.
First of all, XHTML is an excellent idea. Having been based in XML (which is easier to parse than SGML - the markup base for HTML), XHTML is a much, much more interoperable standard. Second of all, the spec has made a number of clarifications which should result in more cross-browser predictability. [/snip] All of these, XML, HTML, XHTML are subsets of SGML. [snip] >For instance, if you use method="post" because XHTML specification says >everything should be in lower case, you will have problems with some >browsers and e-mail programs that only accept POST in upper case and >fallback to GET when they find something else. > > Oh, for God's sake, stop selling snake oil. I'm willing to bet $100 that you haven't even read the specification and are inventing crap as you go. [/snip] Easy there sport, no need to fling words like 'crap' around and make assertions about posters, especially when you do not know them. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
