At 5/1/2001 06:49 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
>The 'security' angle is the only one I consider terribly valid, an was
>what I had in mind when I said I can't think of too many reasons why a
>packaged' template' solution is in order. Obviously it is for you.
>
>I still believe that in most cases it doesn't make much sense to use one,
>for most people, because it's limiting you to a subset of a powerful
>language, and the implementation can be slower. Smarty is on the right
>track by compiling the templates to PHP and cacheing them.
>
>What I'd *love* to see is a template system which is portable between
>various platforms (JSP, CF, PHP, Perl, VBScript). That would, imo, make
>it worhtwhile for people to learn *one* templating system that would be
>cross-platform.
That is where a template system like HTML::Template excels, actually.
It is very simple to implement it in Perl, PHP, Tcl, etc etc.
Steve
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
