On 10/9/07, Andrew Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Honestly, it all seems a bit extreme. At some point, you have to trust
> the people you work with not to go to such lengths to violate an
> objects contract -- which I guess goes back to Tony's point whether
> the language "enforces" private members/functions or whether they are
> simply regarded that way by the developers using them. I would prefer
> both, honestly. :)
>


indeed.

-nathan

Reply via email to