On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 09:41 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 4:39 PM -0400 5/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:31 -0400, tedd wrote:
> >
> >  > While your post dealt with [2] mine was addressing [1]. Understand?
> >
> >Except he already had that part working. He wanted to get the outline.
> >You would know that if you read the full post since he gave a link to
> >what he already had using PHP. When he says:
> >
> >      "That site is also coded in php so I'm guessing that the
> >       watermark is added using a php technology."
> >
> >It means that he can presumably also generate a watermark with an
> >outline using PHP and GD.
> Yeah, but that's only true if you read the post in detail. Look, I 
> always skim what the poster said and then answer as I think he may 
> want. Don't brother me with the details.
> That practice has worked for me for years without any problems 
> whatsoever and now you come along and want me to read and understand 
> everything in detail -- that ain't fair. Next thing you'll want is 
> for me to be right all the time like you are.  :-)

In the interest of increasing my rightness ratio, I'd just like to point
out that I'm not always right :)

> >Comprendez vous?
> Didn't they go out of business?

Wasn't that Comprenez Vous?

*tee hee*

Application and Templating Framework for PHP

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to