On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Stuart Dallas <stut...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 10:34, Rene Veerman wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Funny you should mention all that.  Let's say that you're longer with
>>> that company, either by direct employment or contract consultant.
>>> You've implemented C because you need 'thread'.  Now your replacement
>>> comes in and has no clue about C even though your replacement is a PHP
>>> guru.  How much headache is maintenance gonna be?  Scalability?
>>> Portability? wow....
>> Thanks for posting this before i had to.
>> +1, +1, +1...
> You realise, of course, that the same argument applies to using advanced 
> features of PHP, such as threading should it ever be supported.
> -Stuart

Thanks for supporting PHP thread.  Thus, it would be a lot easier for
any PHP guru to scale, make it portable, or integrate into other PHP
apps without having to juggle C, Ruby, Python... and whatever else is
out there...

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to