Hi, Paul

I personally pretty much like the idea of auto-loaders, but that's a
personal point of view.
If you have always develop with scripts having autoloaders you'll hate to
write a *require_once* command at the beginning of all files. And what
would a dependency-injection-container be without an autoloader ;)

If you write your code in OOP you should always have unique class-names. If
you follow this and use a good naming-convention both ways should be
usable. I prefer to use autoloaders, you maybe not and that makes code so
personalized ;) *like-it*


2012/2/13 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkesle...@googlemail.com>

> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Paul M Foster <pa...@quillandmouse.com>
> wrote:
> > The more I've thought about it since then, the more I've considered it a
> > Good Thing(tm). It makes troubleshooting existing code a whole lot
> > easier. I don't have to wonder what the autoloader is doing or where the
> > files are, on which the current file depends. It sort of obviates the
> > autoloader stuff, but I'd rather do that than spend hours trying to
> > track down which file in which directory contains the class which paints
> > the screen blue or whatever.
> Yeah, this is the sort of problem better handled by a tool than
> switching away from autoloaders.
> Exuberant Ctags is your friend.
> --
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to