> >> Commit: c036828cbd87a5977810c9cd4e099e**91e6e14cd8 >> >>> Author: Levi Morrison <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 >> >>> 09:16:41 -0600 >> >>> Parents: 586bfaf0b8c04a77f4f72ee49b9f85**dbb8217554 >> >>> Branches: master >> >>> >> >>> Link: >> >>> http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.**git;a=commitdiff;h=** >> >>> c036828cbd87a5977810c9cd4e099e**91e6e14cd8< >> http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=c036828cbd87a5977810c9cd4e099e91e6e14cd8 >> > >> >>> >> >>> Log: >> >>> Removed bold style on em; this is mostly important for the wiki, but >> >>> always making 'italic' also bold is overwhelming. >> >>> >> >>> >> >> Noooooooooooooo. The bold-and-italic <em> style for the docs makes a >> huge >> >> improvement (IMO) in emphasizing its contents. If you really want to >> >> "fix" >> >> it for the wiki then go ahead, but I for one would love it to remain on >> >> the >> >> main site. >> >> >> >> >> > If this does what I think it does (for the <emphasis> tag), then I vote >> in >> > favor >> > of italic-only. >> > >> >> It simply removes the bold font weight from text inside <em> tags. To >> preview the changes, see this comparison: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/8aokCwQ.png >> >> On the left is the new un-bolded style, on the right is the style before >> this commit. I'd still like to see the old style, but if we can pick only >> one visual style to use I'd actually prefer the bold over the italics. The >> change makes it much more difficult (for me) to scan for those emphasized >> items in a wall of text. But it's only me complaining so far! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Peter "he-who-doesn't-like-change" Cowburn > > > If it's okay with you I'll just bold the styles in the table, rather than > reverting the change in this commit. >
Also, I agree with you that bold makes more sense here than italic anyway. Unless this is a widespread usage inside of tables I may just change the table markup to use strong instead of em.
