Hi, Joe made a post about the introduction on phpng, what it is, and what it isn't. Some people (myself included) didn't liked that post for various reasons (some says it is opiniated, some doesn't like the tone and the wording, others feel that it is too early to made official announcement about phpng). There were a couple of iteration on improving the text, but it is still not up to our standards imo: http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=history;f=archive/entries/2014-05-27-1.xml ; It is already on hackernews and reddit, so while some people suggested, I think it would be a bad move to just remove it.
Would like to know what do you guys think about the best step, I see the following possible options: - keep it as is - remove it - rewrite it to be more formal and factual(only talk about what it is atm. not what it could be in the future). - create a post explaining that this post is controversional among the core-devs, so it is reflects more of the authors opinion than the projects official view on the topic. I'm mostly interested on the opinion of the core devs, but others also welcome to reply. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
