On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Joe made a post about the introduction on phpng, what it is, and what it > isn't. > Some people (myself included) didn't liked that post for various reasons > (some says it is opiniated, some doesn't like the tone and the wording, > others feel that it is too early to made official announcement about > phpng). > There were a couple of iteration on improving the text, but it is still not > up to our standards imo: > > http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=history;f=archive/entries/2014-05-27-1.xml > ; > It is already on hackernews and reddit, so while some people suggested, I > think it would be a bad move to just remove it. > > Would like to know what do you guys think about the best step, I see the > following possible options: > > - keep it as is > No. I agree that it's too problematic as-is. > - remove it > No. As you said, it's already been disseminated and the last thing we'd want is to give the appearance of censorship. Even if it didn't give that impression, removing it at this point would just create even more confusion. > - rewrite it to be more formal and factual(only talk about what it is > atm. not what it could be in the future). > Yes. > - create a post explaining that this post is controversional among the > core-devs, so it is reflects more of the authors opinion than the > projects > official view on the topic. > Yes. If we do the above suggestion, as well, then this would perhaps focus more on what changes were made and why they were made. --Kris
