Jirka Kosek wrote: > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > > >>it's things like automatic linking and adding () for <function> >>references in normal text, >> > > I thought that this I have hacked year ago.
so you just found out how much i looked into the xsl files :) >>rendering optional parameters a bit more >>clever ... and ... and ... and ... >> > > I can devote some to do it, but is there anyone who wants to use XSL? > When I asked same question year ago, almost noone respond. If there will > be no usage of XSL, why to cutomize stylesheets? chicken/egg problem? no, realy, XSL tools and available documentation have improved since then, while on the DSSSL front nothing new happened e.g. saxon is already faster than jade when producing bightml, although it still loses on the multipage html yet (don't know about other XSLT processors yet) afaik print output isn't as good as with our current setup but with all the emerging problems (pushing TeX buffer sizes to their limit, rendering problems like we had with '--') and with even Sebastian Rahtz saying that the TeX backend to jade needs a complete redesing we seem to be better of at the XSL side in the near future -- Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
