Hi! We received this suggestion about proofreading the manual content:
> Just to make this posting a little more "useful", here is a suggestion. It > is hard to ignore that the documentation has many typos and gross writing > mistakes. Especially the users' notes. It is not only ugly, it also > prevents words from being detected by the search engine. Has anybody ever > thought of combing it all and applying some proofreading? There could be a > group handling a side project in charge of that. > > Best regards, > Luciano Espirito Santo > Santos - SP - Brasil Well, we do it from time to time, but not as a QA effort. Maybe it would be nice to have two or three people with "high quality" English knowledge to reread our English texts... I know I am sometimes quite bad in grammar... Goba
