On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 07:38, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > Hi! > > We received this suggestion about proofreading the manual content: > > > Just to make this posting a little more "useful", here is a suggestion. It > > is hard to ignore that the documentation has many typos and gross writing > > mistakes. Especially the users' notes. It is not only ugly, it also > > prevents words from being detected by the search engine. Has anybody ever > > thought of combing it all and applying some proofreading? There could be a > > group handling a side project in charge of that. > > > > Best regards, > > Luciano Espirito Santo > > Santos - SP - Brasil > > Well, we do it from time to time, but not as a QA effort. > Maybe it would be nice to have two or three people with > "high quality" English knowledge to reread our English > texts... I know I am sometimes quite bad in grammar... > > Goba
We have no control in any real sense over the user notes. It's hard enough just deleting the useless ones, without having to edit the others. They are just that: 'user notes'--not anything we've done--and their content is the authors' own. -- Torben Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com http://www.hybrid17.com http://www.inflatableeye.com +1.604.709.0506
