Although bzip2 is better I must vote +1 for .tar.gz Supporting how to use bunzip2 on windows is a bit of a pain. Hopefully that will change one day.
Regards, Philip On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Sander Roobol wrote: > On 2002.04.07 20:30 Simone Cortesi wrote: > > At 20.19 07/04/02 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> > Anyway, the files unpack just fine on w2k with the right tools > >> [tm] (i > >> > used cygwin, bunzip2). If it doesn't work for you your tools are > >> broken > >> > or you don't know how to use them. > >> > >> Again, as nobody on windows is familiar with bzip2, which is > >> perfectly > >> normal as nobody else uses it, dont expect users to be familiar with > >> it. > >> > >> i strongly recommend to use .tar.gz again. > > > > +1 > > And a +1 from me... > > Sander >
